<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BLACK PANTHER VS. LUKE CAGE: Which film should Singleton do first?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blackgeekdom.com/blog/2007/08/29/black-panther-vs-luke-cage-which-film-should-singleton-do-first/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blackgeekdom.com/blog/2007/08/29/black-panther-vs-luke-cage-which-film-should-singleton-do-first/</link>
	<description>Science-Fiction from a Different Perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:29:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jarrell</title>
		<link>http://blackgeekdom.com/blog/2007/08/29/black-panther-vs-luke-cage-which-film-should-singleton-do-first/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackgeekdom.com/blog/2007/08/29/black-panther-vs-luke-cage-which-film-should-singleton-do-first/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>John Faveau (director: Iron Man) and Singleton have something in common.  They both are good at giving breathtaking life to screen plays (whether written by them or someone else).  I think Luke Cage would be easier for a studio to produce, and could be done at anytime.  However, Marvel Studios should ride the wave and do the Black Panther movie the way it should be done.  It also opens up a wealth of possibilities for a cameo in Fantastic Four movie, if they don&#039;t go with putting him in the next Fantastic Four movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Faveau (director: Iron Man) and Singleton have something in common.  They both are good at giving breathtaking life to screen plays (whether written by them or someone else).  I think Luke Cage would be easier for a studio to produce, and could be done at anytime.  However, Marvel Studios should ride the wave and do the Black Panther movie the way it should be done.  It also opens up a wealth of possibilities for a cameo in Fantastic Four movie, if they don&#8217;t go with putting him in the next Fantastic Four movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarrell</title>
		<link>http://blackgeekdom.com/blog/2007/08/29/black-panther-vs-luke-cage-which-film-should-singleton-do-first/comment-page-1/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackgeekdom.com/blog/2007/08/29/black-panther-vs-luke-cage-which-film-should-singleton-do-first/#comment-790</guid>
		<description>John Faveau (director: Iron Man) and Singleton have something in common.  They both are good at giving breathtaking life to screen plays (whether written by them or someone else).  I think Luke Cage would be easier for a studio to produce, and could be done at anytime.  However, Marvel Studios should ride the wave and do the Black Panther movie the way it should be done.  It also opens up a wealth of possibilities for a cameo in Fantastic Four movie, if they don&#039;t go with putting him in the next Fantastic Four movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Faveau (director: Iron Man) and Singleton have something in common.  They both are good at giving breathtaking life to screen plays (whether written by them or someone else).  I think Luke Cage would be easier for a studio to produce, and could be done at anytime.  However, Marvel Studios should ride the wave and do the Black Panther movie the way it should be done.  It also opens up a wealth of possibilities for a cameo in Fantastic Four movie, if they don&#39;t go with putting him in the next Fantastic Four movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.339 seconds -->
