<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Review:  Speed Racer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blackgeekdom.com/blog/2008/05/19/quick-review-speed-racer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blackgeekdom.com/blog/2008/05/19/quick-review-speed-racer/</link>
	<description>Science-Fiction from a Different Perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 23:26:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obsidian</title>
		<link>http://blackgeekdom.com/blog/2008/05/19/quick-review-speed-racer/comment-page-1/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Obsidian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackgeekdom.com/blog/2008/05/19/quick-review-speed-racer/#comment-592</guid>
		<description>The problem with Speed Racer is that its postives cancel out its neagtives.  The visual style may have been appealing to kids was a turn off to adults.   It tried to pay homage to the orgianl with the Spittle (they acted exactly the way the did in the cartoon, since you never saw it)  which was cool for nostalgia purposes but it grew old fast.   The film was  marketed toward 5 and 10 year boys which is way to narrow of a demographic for the amount of money they spent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Speed Racer is that its postives cancel out its neagtives.  The visual style may have been appealing to kids was a turn off to adults.   It tried to pay homage to the orgianl with the Spittle (they acted exactly the way the did in the cartoon, since you never saw it)  which was cool for nostalgia purposes but it grew old fast.   The film was  marketed toward 5 and 10 year boys which is way to narrow of a demographic for the amount of money they spent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obsidian</title>
		<link>http://blackgeekdom.com/blog/2008/05/19/quick-review-speed-racer/comment-page-1/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>Obsidian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 13:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackgeekdom.com/blog/2008/05/19/quick-review-speed-racer/#comment-735</guid>
		<description>The problem with Speed Racer is that its postives cancel out its neagtives.  The visual style may have been appealing to kids was a turn off to adults.   It tried to pay homage to the orgianl with the Spittle (they acted exactly the way the did in the cartoon, since you never saw it)  which was cool for nostalgia purposes but it grew old fast.   The film was  marketed toward 5 and 10 year boys which is way to narrow of a demographic for the amount of money they spent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Speed Racer is that its postives cancel out its neagtives.  The visual style may have been appealing to kids was a turn off to adults.   It tried to pay homage to the orgianl with the Spittle (they acted exactly the way the did in the cartoon, since you never saw it)  which was cool for nostalgia purposes but it grew old fast.   The film was  marketed toward 5 and 10 year boys which is way to narrow of a demographic for the amount of money they spent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.415 seconds -->

